Uncovering the Truth Behind FINIX
FINIX PAYMENTS INC
San Francisco, CA
Orlando, FL
Finix Payments Inc. (Finix) has been the subject of numerous customer complaints and had at least one lawsuit,
raising concerns about its business practices and customer relations. (GOOGLE SEARCH)
(AI Overview Google)
Complaints about Finix Payments Inc. often involve issues with their payment processing, such as persistent technical problems, security concerns, and a lack of accountability from their support team. Customer reviews also mention difficulties with the underwriting process, API security, and a tendency for the company to shift blame to the customer when issues arise. Some employees have also reported a hostile work environment, citing inexperienced leadership and poor management practices.
Customer complaints
Technical and operational issues:
Customers report frequent problems with the payment stack and internal onboarding processes.
Poor customer support:
Support staff are sometimes inexperienced, unable to admit fault, and may shift responsibility for issues to the customer. Communication can also be inconsistent, with some support interactions dropping off unexpectedly.
Underwriting and security problems:
Reviewers have noted issues with fraudulent merchants being approved while legitimate ones are denied. Concerns have also been raised about API security and workflow issues.
Lack of accountability:
The company is criticized for not taking responsibility for its failures and instead placing the blame on its customers.
Employee complaints
Some employees describe a hostile work environment driven by inexperienced leadership and a "hustle culture" that results in constant blame-shifting and a lack of appreciation.
Management is accused of being out of touch, with a focus on trivial matters rather than substantive issues.
Some reviews suggest a pattern of hiring and then firing employees, with a particularly harsh experience for new hires.
The company has also faced significant employee complaints and some legal actions, suggesting persistent internal issues within its organizational structure.
Furthermore, Finix has expended approximately $200 million of investor capital in less than two years,
prompting questions regarding the efficiency and accountability of its financial management (GOOGLE)
(AI Overview Google)
The statement points to a significant financial burn rate at Finix, raising concerns about the company's use of investor capital. This level of spending ($200 million in under two years) is prompting questions about the company's financial management, its path to profitability, and the efficiency of its operations.
High burn rate:
Finix's rapid expenditure of capital suggests a high "burn rate," a term used to describe how quickly a company is using its invested capital.
Investor concerns:
A high burn rate can raise red flags for investors, especially if it doesn't lead to a clear and quick path to profitability or significant growth.
Focus on efficiency and accountability:
The situation is prompting a closer look at how the company is managing its finances, its spending priorities, and its overall accountability to investors.
FACT - TRUTH - CHECKER
#1 RANKED PAYMENT PROCESSOR
(ChatGPT & Google = FALSE)
432 MILLION TRANSACTIONS PER DAY
(ChatGPT & Google = FALSE)

CEO
Richie Serna
Company Culture:
"Employee reviews highlight a potentially toxic company culture with inconsistent leadership and a tendency to blame individuals rather than address systemic issues." @ Glassdoor
WOULD YOU TRUST SOMONE LIKE THIS WITH YOUR MONEY AND LIFE LONG BUSNIESS?
Legal Director
Daniel Ruby
“Cold and political place. Loyalty is not rewarded. If you’re not part of the inner circle, you’ll be left out.” — @ Glassdoor
IS IT ILLEGAL TO FALSELY ADVERTISE AND STATE COMPANY PERFORMANCE NUMBERS AND REVENUE?


Two New Members
Added Weekly!
There has been so much info submitted thus far about executives level and upper management. We must share it with the public ASAP for there own protection's and decision making.
THE TRUTH IS JUST STARTING TO UNFOLD...
STAY TUNED!!
KNOWN FINIX COMPLAINT - LAWSUIT

Parties: Satori Enterprise Holdings, LLC
filed a lawsuit against Finix Payments, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
Case Number: 6:25-cv-00934
Filed: May 28, 2025

Testimonials
Real Feedback From
Unsatisfied Customers and Employees
" @ BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU"
"@ GLASSDOOR"
“There is constant turnover at the leadership level. Senior hires don’t last more than a few months.”
“Management is inexperienced and lacks clear direction. It feels like we’re always reacting instead of building.”
“Executives say they value people, but their actions don’t show it.”
Finix Employees
"Stay away at all costs"
-1.0 Stars
June 2, 2025
Horrible. Constant issues with their payment stack, and internal onboarding processes.
They don't seem to be worried about fixing issues, as they pass on all responsibility to the customer - read your contract carefully.
Underwriting approving fraudulent merchants, denying legitimate merchants, API security, and workflow issues.
The support team is unable to admit any wrongdoing and passes the blame onto us, the customer.
CEO of IT
The Scammer's at Finix:
A Warning to Any Business Considering
We are a SaaS platform processing over $1.5M/month in payments through Finix. After months of experience,
I can say definitively:
Finix is not ready for any business that values reliability, transparency, or scalability.
Key failures we experienced firsthand:
Unreliable Payouts: Residual payments were withheld without proper reconciliation, despite repeated requests.
No clear documentation, no breakdowns... just missing funds.
Inaccurate Financial Reporting: Residual and transaction reporting was consistently inaccurate.
Even after internal acknowledgment of errors, no corrected or verifiable payouts were provided.
Negligent Fraud Controls: Fraudulent merchants were approved without basic underwriting checks.
Finix paid out to fraudulent actors, then attempted to shift the resulting losses to us platform that had no ability to approve, monitor, or reject merchants.
Silent Operational Disruptions: Settlement failures occurred without warning. Critical communication channels were unilaterally shut down during active risk cases, disrupting our ability to manage customer
Founder of xxxxx Inc.
